If the first question you have after reading this blog title is “what is ontology?” you are not alone. I too had to do a bit of research to get up-to-speed. In short, ontology is a field of study in metaphysics that examines the nature of reality, focusing on what things exist, what they are made of, and how they relate to one another. It also explores the nature of consciousness, examining how our awareness and thoughts connect to the world around us. In theoretical physics, ontology is involved in understanding the fundamental nature of matter, energy, and the universe itself, such as in concepts about the nature of space, time, and consciousness.
Back in 2021 I wrote a 3-part blog series called “Meritology” in which I contended that the same sort of delusional hero-worship of doctors, scientists and so-called “experts” that occurred during the height of the COVID-19 craze, will form the foundation of the societal manipulation that fallen angels will leverage during the coming Great Delusion. Check out all three blog posts here, here and here if you haven’t read them already. In short though, “Meritology” – the worship of and/or obedience to experts – will become the One-World Religion that attracts nearly all humanity.
Meritocracy is a political system where those in charge are selected on the basis of their ability. In other words, it’s a system of government run by experts. I won’t go into all the pitfalls and problems inherent to this system (such as, who gets to decide the type and level of “expertise” needed for a given position?). Instead, I’m going to propose a variation of meritocracy – Meritology. Meritology is a pseudo-religious system where experts are worshipped and obeyed on the basis of their knowledge.
Meritology Part 1: The Psuedo-Religous Worship of Science and Experts
When what appear to be technologically-advanced spaceships are seen in the skies, and beings that resemble extraterrestrials offer their hand in friendship, how will humanity react? When these “aliens” arrive in the midst of feverish political tensions, increasing natural disasters, civil unrest and economic collapse, offering solutions to all of the world’s problems, how do you think people will react? After a brief period of panic and fear the “aliens” will step in to establish friendly relations. Their olive branch will be technology and knowledge that aids humanity. Given the turmoil preceding their arrival, the chance to end the tyranny, mend international relations and “heal the planet” will be irresistible for most.
Once the “aliens” establish themselves as the benefactors to humanity they will become the de facto experts in basically everything… Human scientists will race to understand the new concepts introduced by the fallen angels and bureaucrats will defer public policy decisions based on advice from our “alien” allies.
Meritology Part 2 – From the COVID Cult to Extraterrestrial Saviors
The Alien Invasion is Already Happening??
Recently, I came across a guy named Clif High who has garnered a lot of attention recently for his predictions of an impending alien “invasion” 39 days after Trump appeared on the Joe Rogan podcast:
Now, obviously Dec 3rd came and went without a high-profile UFO battle taking place in our skies. However, that hasn’t dissuaded Clif High, nor his followers, from claiming that the prediction has been fulfilled in the recent spate of increased mystery drones over various countries – including the notable and newsworthy mystery drone sightings over New York and New Jersey that basically began around Dec 3rd.
Clif represents one of the so-called “experts” that I described in my Meritology series. He’s well-studied, articulate and has decades of experience bridging the gap between science and spirituality. Clif has been laying the groundwork for the soon arrival of the fallen angels and the coming Great Delusion.
Who is Clif High?
Clif High is a renowned internet researcher and the creator of the Webbot, a predictive technology that analyzes vast amounts of online data to forecast future events. Using this Webbot tool, High has made a series of controversial and often startling predictions, many of which have garnered widespread attention. As discussed above, one of his most notable predictions involved an “alien invasion” triggered by an event tied to Donald Trump’s appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast, a prediction he made years before the event occurred. Now, with the growing public interest in UFOs and extraterrestrial life, High has become a focal point for discussions on future world events, particularly those involving advanced extraterrestrial entities.
The arrival of advanced alien beings claiming to be benevolent, spiritually-enlightened, and even integral to the stories of humanity’s religious figures would undoubtedly shake the foundations of most major world religions. In a recent interview with Harrison Smith on InfoWars, Clif asserts that the arrival of “extraterrestrials” will lead to the dissolution of traditional religions and the rise of a universal, ontological-based spirituality (a metaphysics-based pseudoscience that seeks to explain reality and consciousness).
Replacing God with a Universal Consciousness
Clif and many other New Agers (he’s a New Age adherent, he just uses more scientific lingo to legitimize metaphysical concepts inherent to New Age spirituality) want to replace the traditional concept of a personal and loving deity with an all-powerful, but impersonal “force” or “consciousness”. They’ll often refer to this force as Creator or Source, however, they strive desperately to avoid attaching any personal or human attributes to Creator/Source. They absolutely cannot abide this “force” having any individuality, emotions or personality because if the Creator of the universe is a singular, personal being then people might get ideas about praying to or even worshipping this being – and to a New Ager, that is far too close to Christianity for their comfort!
So what does it even matter? New Agers call this entity “Creator” and “Source” while Christians refer to Him as God (Yahweh). Aren’t we just talking about the same being in slightly different contexts? Well, it turns out there’s a VERY important distinction. Replacing the traditional Christian understanding of a personal and loving God with the concept of a universal consciousness as the ultimate reality introduces significant moral challenges. Christianity is rooted in a personal God who provides us with a clear moral framework, grounded in the character and teachings of a divine being who is deeply invested in our human welfare. Our relationship with God offers a source of accountability, guidance, and compassion, ensuring that our morality is not just abstract principles but actually about the well-being of individuals and communities. By contrast, a shift to an ontological spirituality focused on universal consciousness will make morality impersonal and detached, undermining the relational aspects that would otherwise give life meaning.
In a framework where universal consciousness replaces a personal God, morality can and will become abstract and subjective, based on philosophical notions rather than grounded principles. This shift ultimately leads to moral relativism, where ethical standards are fluid and dependent on individual or collective interpretations of what aligns with the “universal good.” Without a personal God to anchor morality in a sense of love, justice, and care for humanity, ethical guidelines will lose their emotional resonance and practical applicability, leading to moral ambiguity.
Additionally, ontological spirituality emphasizes self-realization and alignment with the cosmos or your “higher self” (self-worship), which will inevitably shift focus away from interpersonal relationships and communal responsibility. While seeking enlightenment or unity with universal consciousness may be alluring on an individual level, it causes you to neglect the practical, selfless love and care for others that Christ demonstrates. Without a personal God who models sacrificial love and calls for moral accountability, people will inevitably prioritize selfish abstract ideals over tangible acts of selfless compassion and justice.
Ultimately, replacing a personal God with a universal consciousness risks dehumanizing morality. God invites us into a personal relationship with Him through His Son, Jesus (Yahshua) Christ, where we are loved, valued, and guided. This forms a foundation for ethical living rooted in selfless love and empathy. In contrast, a purely abstract spirituality fails to address the relational and emotional dimensions of morality, leaving individuals adrift in a sea of impersonal and ever-changing principles. While ontological spirituality may offer intriguing philosophical insights, its lack of a personal moral anchor will erode the ethical structures that sustain compassionate human interactions, tragically leading many people to commit unspeakable horrors without compunction.
Why This Matters
After the official “Arrival” of the fallen angels posing as benevolent extraterrestrials, there will be a rapid shift in many people’s belief systems. Many will go from recognizing a personal and loving God, to being deluded into believing in an impersonal universal consciousness and chasing after their “higher self”. This is not merely a theological or philosophical change—it is a fundamental redefinition of humanity’s moral and spiritual foundation. Clif High’s predictions and the growing cultural fascination with ontological spirituality reflect a broader trend that seeks to replace traditional religious frameworks (Christianity especially) with abstract metaphysical concepts. While this may appear progressive or enlightening to some, it ultimately strips morality of its relational and compassionate core, leaving society vulnerable to relativism, indifference, and disconnection.
This is precisely why the stakes are so high. As the world braces for the imminent arrival of our “Space Brothers”, the allure of an alien-endorsed universal consciousness and the lack of a personal deity holding you accountable for your actions, will grow incredibly strong. Replacing the deeply personal Christian God with an impersonal, abstract force will swiftly undermine the very principles that hold communities together: love, justice, and accountability. True moral and spiritual grounding comes from a relationship with a God who knows us, cares for us, and calls us to act selflessly. Without that foundation, humanity will lose not only its moral compass but also its capacity for genuine, compassionate connection in the pursuit of a fleeting, impersonal ideal.
If you’ve already read the main content in the Tribulation section of this site, you may now have a better understanding of how society will turn so viciously against Sabbath-keeping Christians in the Last Days. By removing any sort of personal deity from humanity’s belief system, fallen angels will condition the vast majority to turn against the minority of Sabbath-keeping Christians who refuse to participate in any of the mandated self-worship activities. They will compel people to commit the most heinous crimes against the Saints – all because the moral relativism of ontological spirituality condones it.
Uh-huh, and for all Clif High’s speculations, how are your any different? I see lots of assumptions, presumptions, projecting, expectations, and speculations too, from you. And no doubt you have lots of Biblical scripture to “prove” it all, just like 50 thousand bickering denominations of Christianity can do too, for whatever beliefs they want to hold tight to. Even if the Bible was hand delivered to Moses on mount high (which it was NOT), you certainly can’t prove your interpretations of scripture. Right? Unless you are willing to admit one must become somewhat divinely inspired oneself, in order to understand divinely inspired writings, which Clif High claims as well. He claims to sense and work with the intelligent “Ontological God”, and you claim communication with this Being as well. Correct me if I’m wrong, but for all your scriptural support, you still must be “sensing and working with God” to understand what this Being inspired in the Bible. Let’s just assume, for arguments sake, that the Bible is 100% the perfect word from God. Can you prove your interpretations without directly claiming (or implying) that God is communicating with you to help you interpret what it says? Otherwise, you are no different than any person off the street who makes stuff up, spins a few scriptures, and says “that’s what God says”.
My problem with Clif High isn’t that he’s making speculations, assumptions, etc and that I’m somehow gifted with the “correct” knowledge. You are correct, we’re all just communicating our own interpretations of scriptures, or in Clif’s case, his interpretations of his own datasets from his Webbot invention. I actually think he’s right in a lot of his speculations and that the “sci-fi world” he predicts will be ushered in by space aliens will come to pass, but just not in the ways that he is speaking of.
The point of this article isn’t to prove Clif’s speculations about future events wrong, but rather to bring attention to the way he merges science and metaphysics into a New Age religion that seeks to replace a loving personal God with an impersonal natural force called Source/Creator (or in Clif’s case, he calls it “The Ontology”). I highly suspect that folks like Clif will become de facto “experts” that will assist humanity in accepting our new extraterrestrial visitors within the framework of New Age philosophy and ontological metaphysics in the very near future.
I think speculating about the future or thinking about the past is part of the trap. It gets one out of the present moment. I’ve done lots of that, and sometimes still do, but I see it as part of the trap of the simulation now. You don’t know the future anymore than Clif High. He’s got his reasons to believe space aliens are coming, due to his data interpretation, and you think space aliens are coming too, due to your data interpretation (scripture). I used to see lots of aliens in scripture too, but if reality is literally more like “The Matrix” movie than we like to admit (and many science-types/philosopher-types admit it now: Neil Degrasse Tyson, Elon Musk, Donald Hoffman, Nick Bostrom, Gregg Braden, David Icke, Philip K. Dick, Stephen Hawking, etc, etc…) then it is entirely possible the Ontology is messing with us, and aliens may never do open contact. Then again they might. Anything is possible in a simulation, and it is hard to deny the simulation theory hypothesis, when humans are very close to creating a literal matrix, like the movie of the same name, and realistic online role-playing games advance daily.
Clif’s main thing is the “Ontological God” is the All, the Absolute, the Totality, and it is sentient, observant, responsive to everything that is happening, BUT for its own purposes. Clif’s main point is the founding fathers were mostly Deists (ie the old name for Ontotheology) NOT Christians. The founding fathers tried to listen to, and interact with, and follow the Ontology, in their own way. They thought the Ontology supported rebellion against Britain, and if success means Onto-God supported them, then seems they were correct. The Americans temporarily threw off the tyranny of ALL “non-natural law” governments…but only for a short time. The Ontology supported their bravery at that time, and America was free of government for a while. The human slave mentality could NOT be totally overcome, though, and America still insisted on libertarian government (ie small government but still a form on enslavement) and still maintained black slavery. In time, everybody has now become enslaved to US Inc.
The controllers of the world (both human and non-human) are experts are infiltration and takeover, and there were simply not enough serious Deists back then to eventually throw off ALL slave mentality. And the world is enslaved again. America is even the world ruling slavery system now, with their world reserve currency US dollar, that is being challenged by BRICS+ and will probably disappear soon. Enslaving the world to a theocratic Christian Reich will be FAR worse, because people can justify anything, when they think God commands it and is on their side. Seems that is a big theme the Ontology wants resolved. Is God a monster who commands murder at his command, as the Old Testament God is rife with examples of such. And then the loving God, of course, does worse by burning the vast majority in literal fire forever. These are major themes and milestones of discernment, IMHO. I could go on and on with my own speculations about what is really the big issues, but Clif believes in an intelligent Ontological God, that is working certain things out for ITS OWN PURPOSES, which will always be mysterious.
Clif says some obvious things, like with all the suffering in the world, it sure seems like the Ontology apparently doesn’t give a crap about our suffering but a bigger purpose is being worked out in human history. The universe uses us all. I agree science IS metaphysics (meta, mind, and physical, are one and the same, consciousness is fundamental, and physicality is a projected illusion from consciousness, as sure as E=mc2). The double slit experiment proves reality reacts to our thoughts and observations. Even experts in quantum mechanics admit that if you think you understand quantum physics, it means you don’t! It is too strange to fully understand, as would open contact aliens, if that even happens. So, Clif is not against a personal God, but not a loving one as we would understand it. Sometimes it seems like Onto is loving, and sometimes it just ain’t so. Clif does not support an impersonal natural force, but rather a sentient, responsive, totality, which is doing strange things for its own purposes we will never fully understand. Similar to those who claim to understand quantum physics, if someone claims to understand the Ontology, they don’t! Following de facto “experts” instead of thinking for oneself is a failing of people in general. People need to learn to think for themselves, and be responsible for their own way of thinking. I see some truth in many things: New Age philosophy, Ontology, metaphysics, other ancient texts, Nag Hammadi, Bible, movies, songs, comic book characters, etc, etc… I don’t limit myself these days, and less mind controlled with religion, which I think is another major theme for the Ontology. If you really think donkey’s and snakes can talk, simply because your “holy” book says so, then that is religious mind control. There are rational interpretation methods called parable, metaphor, allegory, symbolism, achetypes, etc…. esoteric versus exoteric understandings is another theme. I could go on and on, but I’ll stop now. 🙂